Arc.dev vs Turing
Arc.dev and Turing side by side on 16 fixed comparators, with a source and check date on every factual cell.
Arc.dev Vetted talent network Arc.dev is a remote hiring platform that matches companies with pre-vetted software developers for both freelance contracts and full-time roles, using AI-assisted sourcing and screening.
- Model
- Vetted talent network
- Talent from
- Global (Arc states 190 countries)
- Vetting
- Arc markets its network as the "Top 2% of Talent" and says candidates are "fully vetted for domain expertise and English fluency". The 2% is Arc's own positioning claim, not a published pass rate. [1]
Turing Vetted talent network Turing runs a global remote expert network that it connects with companies building AI, describing itself as "Connecting world-class talent with the companies building the future of AI"; it historically staffed remote software engineers.
- Model
- Vetted talent network
- Talent from
- Global
- Vetting
- Turing states that vetting flows are configured per role and project. In one published case study it says a mobilised pool of 1,200-plus domain experts each cleared an adaptive AI video interview plus KYC, identity, AML and compliance checks. [2]
Arc.dev vs Turing vs Flexiple
16 fixed comparators · 3 differ · 4 match| Comparator | Arc.dev | Turing | Flexiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model Which bucket the platform sits in, as we classify it | Vetted talent network | Vetted talent network | India talent graph with managed hiring |
| Talent from The talent geography we read the platform as serving | Global (Arc states 190 countries) | Global | India |
| Vetting Screening the platform publishes about its own pool | Arc markets its network as the "Top 2% of Talent" and says candidates are "fully vetted for domain expertise and English fluency". The 2% is Arc's own positioning claim, not a published pass rate. [1] | Turing states that vetting flows are configured per role and project. In one published case study it says a mobilised pool of 1,200-plus domain experts each cleared an adaptive AI video interview plus KYC, identity, AML and compliance checks. [2] | Pre-vetted shortlists, screened per request |
| Engagement Contract shapes the platform publishes | Two models: freelance hires billed hourly at "$15 - $110+" per hour, and full-time permanent placement charged at "20% of the annual salary". [3] | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Contract or full-time, remote from India |
| Pricing The fee schedule as published, with the platform's own effective date | Arc's pricing page lists freelance talent at $15 to $110+ per hour and a full-time placement fee of 20% of annual salary. Arc publishes no effective date on that page; checked 13 August 2026. [3] | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Browsing the pool is free; you pay only when you engage |
| Who keeps the spread Whether the platform discloses what it keeps between client and talent | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Our fee is in the rate you approve; nothing is taken from the engineer |
| Speed to shortlist Time to first candidates, only where the platform publishes one | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Turing publishes a 4-day claim on its hiring pages: "Hire software developers remotely within 4 days" and "4 days to fill most roles, sometimes same day." [4] | First pre-vetted shortlist within 48 hours |
| Compliance Payroll, contracts and classification the platform says it handles | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Payroll and compliance handled |
| Payment protection Escrow, payment terms or money-back guarantee, as the platform publishes it | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Rates are approved upfront; you pay only once an engineer starts |
| Trial terms The free trial or risk-free period the platform publishes, on its own terms | Arc attaches a risk-free guarantee to its freelance plan: "We offer a risk-free trial period of up to two weeks." No trial is listed against the full-time placement plan. Arc publishes no effective date on that page; checked 13 August 2026. [3] | Turing offers a 3-week risk-free trial: "If you are satisfied with the developers, you keep working with them and pay their salary including the first 3 weeks. But, if you are not satisfied during the trial period, then you won't pay anything." [4] | First pre-vetted shortlist within 48 hours; no fee until an engineer starts |
| Dispute handling The route the platform documents when work quality is contested | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | A dedicated manager handles replacement |
| Best for Our view of the buyer the model suits | Dedicated engineers without in-house screening | Dedicated engineers without in-house screening | Offshore engineering teams from India's talent pool |
| Founded Founding year from a filing or the company's own timeline | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | 2018 [5] | 2016 |
| Headquarters Stated principal office, from a filing or the company's own page | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | San Francisco, USA [6] | India |
| Screening burden Our view of who does the filtering work | On the platform: pool is screened before you see it | On the platform: pool is screened before you see it | On Flexiple: shortlists screened per request |
| Commitment shape Our view of the lock-in the model implies | Contract to full-time; terms set per platform | Contract to full-time; terms set per platform | Contract or full-time; pay only when you engage |
This page rebuilds from a maintained dataset, not a one-off article. Last reviewed 13 Aug 2026.
Hiring engineers? Flexiple tracks 97.9M profiles in its India talent graph, with live salary medians and a pre-vetted shortlist within 48 hours. See the live market data › Hire React developers ›
Flexiple: a pre-vetted shortlist in 48 hours
Browsing Flexiple's talent pool is free. You pay only when you engage.
Where they overlap, where they split
computed from the datasetSame model
Both are vetted talent networks, so the real differences sit in where the talent comes from, how deep the vetting goes and what each engagement costs.
Talent geography
Arc.dev draws talent from Global (Arc states 190 countries); Turing from Global.
Pricing
Arc.dev: hourly rates
What review sites say
Trustpilot TrustScore, as published on each listingScores are each listing's published aggregate on the date shown, quoted as Trustpilot publishes them. A listing can mix reviews from clients, freelancers and candidates; we do not audit or adjust the numbers, and they can change the day after we check.
What each platform publishes about itself
every claim carries a numbered sourceArc.dev
- Charges $15 to $110+ per hour for freelance hires, with a risk-free trial of up to two weeks on that plan, and 20% of annual salary for full-time placements, per its own pricing page. [3]
- Arc says its network covers 450,000 talent in 190 countries and markets them as the top 2% of talent, fully vetted. Company-stated figures. [1]
- Arc describes itself as a distributed team spanning 12 countries. [7]
- Arc.dev's site footer lists Codementor under a BRANDS heading alongside Arc, presenting the mentorship marketplace and the hiring platform as products of the same company. [1]
Alternatives to Arc.dev and Turing
closest models first, sourced rows counted on each card-
Andela Vetted talent network Andela is a global talent marketplace that connects companies with vetted remote software engineers and other technologists. It launched in Lagos in 2014 and says it now sources from 135+ countries. Latin America United States Europe & UK Global 6 of 16 rows sourced
Alternatives
-
CloudDevs Vetted talent network CloudDevs is a talent marketplace that connects companies with pre-vetted, timezone-aligned Latin American developers and designers, claiming matches within 24 hours. Latin America United States Pricing CloudDevs advertises rates of $45 to $75 per hour on its own homepage. Checked 7 August 2026. 2 of 16 rows sourced
Alternatives
-
Gun.io Vetted talent network Gun.io is a talent network that vets senior software engineers and matches them with companies for freelance, contract, and full-time roles while handling sourcing and talent management. 2 of 16 rows sourced
Alternatives
-
Lemon.io Vetted talent network Lemon.io is a marketplace that connects startups with vetted freelance developers primarily from Europe and Latin America, promising matches within about 24-48 hours. Latin America United States Europe & UK Pricing Lemon.io does not publish hourly rates. Its pricing page states there are no upfront fees, that clients pay only for work delivered, and that there is no minimum engagement: "engage for a single sprint or for the long haul". Checked 7 August 2026. 9 of 16 rows sourced
Alternatives
-
Proxify Vetted talent network Proxify is a network that connects businesses with remote developers and tech specialists, handling contracts, compliance and payroll on behalf of clients. Pricing Proxify's pricing page quotes €5,100 to €8,000 per month, "Equivalent to €32-€50/hour", described as "All expenses included. No hidden costs." The page adds that additional recruitment cost is "Included" and the notice period for contract termination is 2 weeks. Rates shown are the default state of Proxify's on-page calculator, which varies by role, seniority, number of developers, commitment, buyer location and currency (checked 11 August 2026). 9 of 16 rows sourced
Alternatives
What each platform publishes
7 disclosure rows · Flexiple pinnedA tick means our dataset holds a value the platform publishes itself, read from its own page on the date its citation carries. A cell reading "Not in our dataset" is a statement about our records, not about the company: it does not mean the platform publishes nothing.
| Disclosure | Flexiple our own description | Arc.dev on this page | Turing on this page | you added | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee schedule A fee or rate schedule the platform publishes itself | Free to browse, pay on engagement | Published, and sourced in our dataset: Published [3] | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Vetting process A published account of how its own pool is screened | Pre-vetted, screened per request | Published, and sourced in our dataset: Published [1] | Published, and sourced in our dataset: Published [2] | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Contract shapes The engagement types it publishes for buyers | Contract or full-time | Published, and sourced in our dataset: Published [3] | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Time to shortlist A time to first candidates the platform states itself | 48 hours | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: Published [4] | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Compliance and payroll A documented payroll, contracting or classification offer | Payroll and compliance handled | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Founding year A founding year on record in a filing or its own timeline | 2016 | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: 2018 [5] | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row | |
| Headquarters A principal office on record | India | No sourced value in our dataset for this row | Published, and sourced in our dataset: San Francisco, USA [6] | Published, and sourced in our dataset: No sourced value in our dataset for this row |
Compare any two platforms
78 platforms · 46 full pair pagesPick two different platforms to compare them.
Flexiple's India talent pool
live market data · 97.9M profiles trackedThe comparison ends here; this is our own data. Most articles comparing Arc.dev and Turing quote prices that go stale. These numbers come from Flexiple's talent graph: real pool sizes and median salaries for remote engineers in India, refreshed with every site update.
Why teams pick Flexiple
and when Arc.dev or Turing fits better97.9M profiles in the talent graph
Every search runs over Flexiple's live graph of India's professionals, the same data behind the salary pages on this site.
Pre-vetted shortlist in 48 hours
Tell us the role and budget once. The first screened profiles arrive within 48 hours, so comparing candidates replaces screening applicants.
Browsing is free, pay only on engage
Exploring the pool and requesting a shortlist cost nothing. Fees start only when an engineer actually starts.
Payroll and compliance handled
Contracts, payroll and Indian employment compliance are run by Flexiple, whether the engagement is contract or full-time.
When Arc.dev or Turing fits
- Their talent geography or niche matches your exact need
- You already know the seniority and stack you want and just need a match
- Your budget clears their published rates and minimum commitments
Between the two: Arc.dev draws talent from Global (Arc states 190 countries) and prices via hourly rates; Turing draws talent worldwide.
Flexiple: a pre-vetted shortlist in 48 hours
Browsing Flexiple's talent pool is free. You pay only when you engage.
Teams we've built for
From teams that hired through Flexiple
Flexiple has exceeded our expectations with their focus on customer satisfaction! The freelancers are brilliant at what they do and have made an immense impact. Highly recommended :)
Overall Flexiple brought in high-level of transparency with extremely quick turnarounds in the hiring process at a significantly lower cost than any alternate options we had considered.
Flexiple spent a good amount of time understanding our requirements, resulting in accurate recommendations and quick ramp up by developers. We also found them to be much more affordable than other alternatives for the same level of quality.
Frequently asked questions
Both are vetted talent networks. They differ on talent geography, vetting depth and pricing: the comparison table on this page shows each platform's talent region where we hold a verified value.
Arc.dev uses a hourly rates model. Arc's pricing page lists freelance talent at $15 to $110+ per hour and a full-time placement fee of 20% of annual salary. Arc publishes no effective date on that page; checked 13 August 2026. Per arc.dev, checked 12 Aug 2026. Which lands cheaper depends on the role, the rate and how long the engagement runs; the figures above are each platform's own published terms.
We do not publish an overall winner. Which is better depends on the role you are filling, the budget behind it and how much screening you want to keep in house, so this page sets Arc.dev and Turing side by side on 16 fixed comparators instead of naming a favourite. Every company fact in that table carries the source we read it on and the date we checked it, so you can weigh the rows that matter to your team rather than take our word for it.
As of 11 Aug 2026, Arc.dev holds a 4.4 TrustScore on Trustpilot from 196 reviews, and Turing holds a 2.7 TrustScore on Trustpilot from 198 reviews. A Trustpilot listing mixes reviews from clients, freelancers and candidates; we report the published aggregate and do not audit it. For reference, Flexiple holds a 4.6 TrustScore on Trustpilot from 19 reviews.
Flexiple runs an India talent graph and shares a pre-vetted shortlist within 48 hours of a request, with payroll and compliance handled. Browsing the pool is free; you pay only when you engage.
Sources
8 sources · dataset reviewed 13 Aug 2026- [1]Arc.dev · arc.dev homepage: "Hire the Top 2% of Talent" and "Meet ready to interview candidates who are fully vetted for domain expertise and English fluency." The page sets out no screening stages. · Arc says its network covers 450,000 talent in 190 countries and markets them as the top 2% of talent, fully vetted. Company-stated figures. · Arc.dev's site footer lists Codementor under a BRANDS heading alongside Arc, presenting the mentorship marketplace and the hiring platform as products of the same company.arc.devchecked 12 Aug 2026
- [2]Turing · turing.com/frontier-ai/experts: "Vetting flows built to each role and project." Under a "CASE STUDY" heading: "Turing mobilized a vetted pool of 1,200-plus domain experts. Every expert cleared Turing's adaptive AI video interview, customized to their background, along with full KYC, identity, AML, and compliance checks."turing.comchecked 12 Aug 2026
- [3]Arc.dev · arc.dev/pricing lists two plans: freelance hires at "$15 - $110+" per hour, and full-time hires at "20% of the annual salary", with ATS integration and access to a worldwide candidate pool on the full-time plan. · arc.dev/pricing: "Freelance hires" at "$15 - $110+" per hour and "Full-time hires" at "20% of the annual salary". The page carries no effective date. · arc.dev/pricing, "Freelance hires" plan, under the heading "Risk-free guarantee": "We offer a risk-free trial period of up to two weeks." The "Full-time hires" plan, priced at "20% of the annual salary", lists no trial. The page carries no effective date. · Charges $15 to $110+ per hour for freelance hires, with a risk-free trial of up to two weeks on that plan, and 20% of annual salary for full-time placements, per its own pricing page.arc.devchecked 12 Aug 2026
- [4]Turing · Page headline and body, verbatim: "Hire software developers remotely within 4 days" and "4 days to fill most roles, sometimes same day." · turing.com/hire/software-developers: "Get 3-week risk-free trial" and, in the FAQ, "The purpose of the 3-week no-risk trial period is to start working with the developers and include them in the team. If you are satisfied with the developers, you keep working with them and pay their salary including the first 3 weeks. But, if you are not satisfied during the trial period, then you won't pay anything." The hiring steps list step 4 as "Begin your trial: Start building with a no-risk 3 week trial period."turing.comchecked 12 Aug 2026
- [5]Turing · Forbes, 12 August 2023, states Turing was founded in 2018 by Jonathan Siddharth and Vijay Krishnan. · Founded in 2018 by Jonathan Siddharth (CEO) and Vijay Krishnan (CTO), who had previously built an AI-powered content recommendation company.forbes.comchecked 7 Aug 2026
- [6]Turing · "Based in San Francisco, California, Turing is a leading research accelerator for frontier AI labs and a trusted partner for global enterprises deploying advanced AI systems."turing.comchecked 13 Aug 2026
- [7]Arc.dev · Arc describes itself as a distributed team spanning 12 countries.arc.devchecked 12 Aug 2026
- [8]Turing · Announced a $111 million Series E in March 2025.turing.comchecked 7 Aug 2026
